Skip to main content

52-Week Saving Challenge Calculator

If some of you who are still puzzled on how to calculate your total savings after completing the 52-week saving challenge, here's a quick spreadsheet for your reference for a number of amounts starting at 5 pesos.

It's easier and better to do it in spreadsheets because you can just define a sequence like just put 5 on the first row, then 10 on the second row, highlight the two, then drag the lower-right handle down to automatically create the sequence. The spreadsheet will do that for you automatically.

The formula is simple, the amount you choose to save weekly is multiplied by the order of the week, so since there are a total of 52 weeks in one year, the amount you save per week is multiplying. If you choose to save 10 pesos per week, then you will have to save 10 pesos in the first week, 20 pesos on the second week and so on until the 52nd week which you must put up utmost 260 pesos on your piggy bank.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PROVEN and TESTED: Step-by-step guide to Register Alumni Association with SEC Philippines

Registering and Incorporating your High School or College Alumni Association with the Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) is a straightforward process now especially that SEC already have an online process. Here is how we registered our Non-stock and non-profit alumni organization with the SEC in less than a month process. Prepare the personal information of your incorporators Before going to the SEC website, you will the the following information of your incorporators prepared: Complete name such as their first name, middle name, last name Birth date Address, and  TIN number Use the SEC eSPARC Online Company Registration Go to the SEC website and look for the Online Services and select SEC eSPARC and click on the Regular Processing. Alumni associations are non stock corporation so you won't be able to avail of the OneSEC Processing. Remember the following important step: Select the nearest SEC office from your area, you will need to bring the signed and printed copy later o

Reaction Paper for the movie The Count of Monte Cristo

The Second Part of the Reaction Paper on the Count of Monte Cristo Movie. The Count of Monte Cristo is a great story that helps you to realize how far the reaches of vengeance can really go. When the Count is going around ruining people it seems like he is more of a machine than a person. It seems like he has no emotions and can’t forgive the people who hurt him. Although some people might argue that the people who wronged the Count truly had what was coming to them, some of the Count’s actions could be seen as unnecessary. In the end everyone will be punished or rewarded by God and you shouldn’t be worried about what other people do or say as much as you are worried about yourself. “God will give me justice,” this line which was engraved in the wall on the prison was retained on my mind when I watched the movie” The Count of Monte Cristo.” This movie amazed me very much because of its excellent theme. I really like the story because it has a mixed of drama, suspense and rom

Pluggle Review: 6 Reasons Why I doubt Pluggle and Why I'm Not Joining

First thing first, I am not concluding that this Pluggle is a scam because as per my observation and as far as my knowledge is concerned, people including my close friends seems profiting from this scheme and got the money they invested into it in a short period of time, and with profit ( although I'm sure the return of investment they got was paid by the people they invited and not from the company itself ). I think there's no doubt as to their legitimacy because, YES they are legitimate and are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Philippines as PLUGGLE INC. Are they scam? " Scam " is defined as a " dishonest scheme or a fraud ", are they being dishonest? I think no because they intend to do what they say. Are they " fraudulent "? Fraud is defined as " wrongful or criminal deception intended  to result in financial or personal gain "? This is also vague but I think I was struck by the last pa